WELCOME TO AASHAYEIN LAW EDUCATION CENTER

  • 3rd Floor, Radhika Heights, 284, in front of APT House, Zone-II, Maharana Pratap Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462011

  • +91 9691073595 Office, Bhopal

Posted by Aishwarya ma'am

Fake Cops, Real Crimes: The Rise Of Impersonation In Law Enforcement

The rise of impersonation crimes is becoming a global concern, with fraudsters exploiting both physical and digital vulnerabilities. Among these crimes, the concept of "digital arrest" is emerging as a serious threat. Fraudsters, masquerading as law enforcement officials, manipulate victims into believing they are under legal scrutiny, extorting money under the guise of fines, bail, or case settlements.

Digital Arrest: A Legal Perspective on Emerging Threats

In today’s interconnected digital world, the phenomenon of "digital arrest" has emerged as a disturbing trend in cybercrime. Fraudsters exploit the digital realm to simulate the authority of law enforcement agencies, coercing unsuspecting individuals into surrendering sensitive information or money under the pretense of legal action. This article explores the concept of digital arrest, its modus operandi, the legal challenges it presents, and the reforms required to combat it effectively.

You can also read the latest judgment by visiting [Latest Judgment].
For more information, visit [Aashayein Enquiry Section]

What Is Digital Arrest?

A digital arrest refers to a cybercrime where perpetrators impersonate law enforcement or investigative agencies, threatening individuals with fictitious legal repercussions. Fraudsters often leverage advanced technology, including spoofed emails, cloned websites, fake caller IDs, and even video calls, to create a convincing narrative. Victims are coerced into transferring money or sharing confidential details under the guise of avoiding arrest, prosecution, or penalties.

Legal Framework and Vague Provisions:

India’s legal framework still relies heavily on colonial-era laws like the Police Act of 1861. These outdated laws lack provisions to address modern crimes like digital arrests and fake police stations effectively.

CrPC Section 2(s): Defines a police station but lacks clarity on mandatory declarations and notifications, leaving room for misuse.

Case Precedents: Instances like the Vigilance Police Station in Patna not being officially declared highlight procedural gaps.

Modus Operandi of Digital Arrest Fraudsters

1. Identity Spoofing: Fraudsters pose as law enforcement officials from agencies like the police, CBI, or Income Tax Department. They use fake credentials, uniforms, or websites to establish credibility.

2. Psychological Pressure: Victims are threatened with immediate arrest, fines, or public shaming unless they comply with the fraudsters’ demands.

3. Immediate Action Demand: Fraudsters create urgency, compelling victims to transfer funds or disclose sensitive information immediately.

4. Use of Technology: Cybercriminals use caller ID spoofing, AI-driven voice modulation, and cloned government websites to deceive their targets.

5. Personalized Attacks: By leveraging stolen or publicly available data, scammers tailor their approach to make the threat seem credible and specific to the victim.

Recent Cases of Digital Arrest in India

1. Mumbai Elderly Woman Scam: In January 2025, an elderly woman lost ₹1.5 crore to fraudsters posing as SIT officers. They claimed she was involved in a financial scam and coerced her into transferring funds to “clear her name.”

2. Air Hostess Duped: An air hostess in Maharashtra was tricked into paying ₹10 lakh under the pretense of avoiding arrest in a fabricated legal case.

3. Jaipur Elderly Man Scam: A 72-year-old man was defrauded of ₹8 lakh after being accused of money laundering in a fabricated case.

Legal Challenges Posed by Digital Arrest

1. While the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Indian Penal Code address cybercrimes, there are no specific provisions targeting digital arrest frauds.

2. Digital crimes often span multiple states or countries, complicating jurisdiction and enforcement.

3. Fraudsters use sophisticated tools like VPNs and encrypted communication, making it challenging for law enforcement to trace them.

4. Many victims are unaware of their rights and the modus operandi of such scams, leading to delayed reporting.

Legal Remedies Against Digital Arrest Scams

1. Provisions Under BNS and IT Act:

  • Section 66D, IT Act: Covers cheating by personation using computer resources.
  • Section 318(4), BNS: Penalizes cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.
  • Section 336(3), BNS: Addresses forgery for the purpose of cheating.

2. Filing Complaints:

  • Victims can file complaints on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in).
  • Complaints can also be lodged at the nearest police station under relevant BNS and IT Act provisions.

3. Banks and payment gateways must act swiftly to freeze transactions reported by victims.

Proposed Legal Reforms

1. Introduction of a Digital Crime Law: A comprehensive law addressing modern cybercrimes, including digital arrest, is urgently needed.

2. Strengthening Cyber Policing: Specialized cybercrime units with advanced technology and training should be established nationwide.

3. Public Awareness Campaigns: Regular campaigns to educate citizens on identifying scams, reporting mechanisms, and legal rights.

4. International Collaboration: Countries must collaborate to address cross-border digital frauds, ensuring fraudsters cannot evade justice by operating from overseas.

Preventive Measures for Individuals

1. Always verify the identity of individuals claiming to be law enforcement officials by contacting the respective organization directly.

2. Do not disclose sensitive information over unsolicited calls, emails, or messages.

3. Fraudsters often create a sense of urgency. Take time to evaluate the situation before taking any action.

4. Ensure sensitive transactions are conducted through secure and verified channels.

Conclusion

Digital arrest scams reflect the ingenuity of modern cybercriminals and the vulnerabilities in existing legal frameworks. Addressing this menace requires a multipronged approach, including legal reforms, technological advancements, and public awareness. As technology evolves, so must our legal and societal responses to ensure citizens are protected from such malicious practices

16 Jan 2025
Back