WELCOME TO AASHAYEIN LAW EDUCATION CENTER

  • 3rd Floor, Radhika Heights, 284, in front of APT House, Zone-II, Maharana Pratap Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462011

  • +91 9691073595 Office, Bhopal

23 Dec 2024

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

42,000 Regional Judgments Translated: AI Boosts Judicial Accessibility!

Globally, artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming many industries, and the Indian court is already feeling the effects of this growing influence. As technology develops, artificial intelligence (AI) is being used to improve court efficiency, decrease case backlogs, and increase transparency. AI-powered tools are helping with case management, predictive analysis, and legal research, facilitating speedier decision-making and better access to justice. AI offers a chance to revolutionize the Indian judiciary and make it more approachable, effective, and prepared for the future....

Read More
21 Dec 2024

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

Scuffle Outside Parliament: Rahul Gandhi Charged -Could It Lead to Arrest and Disqualification

Based on a complaint by BJP MP Hemang Joshi, the Delhi Police registered a case against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi after a scuffle broke out outside Parliament on Thursday. The clash occurred during chaotic protests by MPs from both the ruling BJP and the opposition alliance INDIA. The BJP alleged that Rahul Gandhi pushed an MP, causing him to fall on Pratap Chandra Sarangi and injure him. On the other hand, the Congress accused BJP MPs of pressuring its leaders,....

Read More
20 Dec 2024

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

Can Advocates Be Journalists? Supreme Court Answered in recent case

The Bar Council of India (BCI) informed the Supreme Court that a practicing lawyer cannot simultaneously hold accreditation as a journalist. This issue came up in the case Mohd. Kamran v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. [SLP(Crl) No. 9615/2024; Diary No. 28200/2024], where Advocate Mohd. Kamran sought clarity on whether his dual roles as a practicing lawyer and a freelance journalist could coexist. The Bench of Justices Abhay S. Oka and Manmohan referred the issue to the Bar Council....

Read More
19 Dec 2024

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

SC's Landmark Ruling: Court Can Ask Defendants to Prove Their Case First

The Division Bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan of Supreme Court in the recent case of “Jami Venkata Suryaprabha & Anr. v. Tarini Prasad Nayak & Ors” gave an important ruling on Order 18 rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC) and held that court can ask the defendant to give evidence to prove his plea first, if the proving of the plea can lead to disposal of the case. The Court noted that while....

Read More
18 Dec 2024

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

Is Chanting Jai Shri Ram Offense or Expression of freedom of speech? Supreme Court Probes

The Supreme Court's recent deliberation raises significant questions about the boundaries of free speech and religious expression in the context of Indian law. On Monday, a bench comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and Sandeep Mehta engaged in an inquiry into whether the chanting of a religious phrase, specifically “Jai Shri Ram,” constitutes a criminal offense. This issue arose during the hearing of a petition challenging the Karnataka High Court's decision to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals accused of shouting the....

Read More
17 Dec 2024

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

One Nation, One Election: The Big Shift in India’s Electoral Landscape

Two bills supporting the idea of “One Nation, One Election” “The Constitution 129th Amendment Bill, 2024, and the Union Territories Laws Amendment Bill, 2024” were introduced in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, December 17, after a vote. Reports suggest that the Union Cabinet has approved the recommendation of a High-Level Committee to hold simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha, State Assemblies, municipal bodies, and panchayats, all within 100 days of the general elections. What exactly is this bill The bill,....

Read More
13 Dec 2024

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

Is Justice Slipping Away? Exploring the Misuse of Cruelty Laws through Atul Subhash’s Tragic Story

Section 498A has traditionally been regarded as a crucial provision for the protection of women. However, in recent times, the section has undergone a shift, and instead of safeguarding women, it has been misused to harass men. This change has become increasingly apparent, especially in light of recent events, such as the tragic suicide of Bengaluru techie Atul Subhash, which has sparked nationwide discussions on the matter. Amid this ongoing debate, the Supreme Court has voiced its concern, emphasizing that....

Read More
12 Dec 2024

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

81 Crore on Free Rations: Supreme Court Demands Shift to Job Creation for Migrant Workers

There is a well-known saying that if you keep giving things away for free, people will eventually stop working altogether. This highlights the idea that when the government focuses on providing free resources to individuals instead of creating employment opportunities, the long-term consequence may be a population that becomes reliant on government aid rather than pursuing work or self-sufficiency. When the solicitor general told the Supreme Court in a recent case that about 81 crore people were receiving free or subsidized....

Read More
09 Dec 2024

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

Supreme Court Slams Delay: Orders Police to Verify Credentials of Government Job Candidates Within Six Months

The Supreme Court recently emphasized that police officers must verify the character, background, nationality, and authenticity of documents submitted by candidates selected for government jobs within six months of their appointment. The Court highlighted that this verification should occur at the initial stage to prevent future complications. This ruling came as the Court set aside the termination of an ophthalmic assistant just two months before their retirement. Background of the case The petitioner, who joined public service on March 6,....

Read More
07 Dec 2024

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

MERELY CALLING THE WIFE FOR CONCILIATION DOES NOT AMOUNT TO MENTAL HARASSMENT

In a recent case of Sudha Bai & Others AND State of Karnataka & ANR (CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7090 OF 2023), the Karnataka High Court interpreted section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and held that merely calling the wife for conciliation does not amount to mental harassment under section 498A of IPC. The case arose from a family dispute between the complainant and her husband. As per the facts of the case, the couple married in the....

Read More