WELCOME TO AASHAYEIN LAW EDUCATION CENTER

  • 3rd Floor, Radhika Heights, 284, in front of APT House, Zone-II, Maharana Pratap Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462011

  • +91 9691073595 Office, Bhopal

17 Mar 2025

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

Directions for Accumulation Under Section 17 of The Transfer of Property Act 1882

Introduction The rule against accumulation under Section 17 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, deals with restrictions on accumulating income from a property instead of using it. While the law allows temporary accumulation, it prohibits indefinite accumulation to ensure that the property benefits its intended beneficiaries within a reasonable time. However, there are certain exceptions where accumulation is permitted. General Rule on Accumulation A direction for accumulation means an instruction that prevents enjoyment of the income generated from a....

Read More
17 Mar 2025

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

Rule Against Perpetuity Under Section 14 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Introduction The rule against perpetuity is a fundamental principle in property law that prevents property from being tied up indefinitely. It ensures that property remains transferable and accessible for trade, commerce, and public welfare. The main purpose of this rule is to avoid situations where property becomes unalienable (cannot be transferred) for an indefinite period, which can hinder economic growth and societal progress. Meaning and Objective of the Rule The term "perpetuity" refers to an indefinite period. The rule prohibits....

Read More
17 Mar 2025

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

Transfer of property to Unborn Person under Section 13 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882

Under the Transfer of Property Act, property cannot be transferred directly to an unborn person because Section 5 states that a transfer of property must occur between two living persons. This means that the transferee must exist at the time of transfer. Since an unborn person does not yet exist legally, any direct transfer to such a person is void. However, there are certain legal mechanisms through which property can be transferred for the benefit of an unborn person.  Who....

Read More
17 Mar 2025

Posted by: Aishwarya Chourasia

Judgment Writing Tips for Chhattisgarh Judiciary Exam 2025

Judgment writing is the only part of the Chhattisgarh Judiciary Mains Exam 2025. To excel in this section, candidates must have a strong grasp of legal principles, procedural laws, and structured writing skills. Importance of Judgment Writing in Judiciary Exams Judgment writing tests a candidate’s ability to: Analyze legal issues. Apply relevant laws. Structure arguments logically. Present findings in a clear and concise manner. Maintain a formal and legally sound tone. Judgment Writing Tips for Chhattisgarh Judiciary Exam 1. Understand....

Read More
12 Mar 2025

Posted by: Manas shrivastava

Condition Restraining Enjoyment of Property under Section 11 of the Transfer of Property Act

Section 11 of the Transfer of Property Act deals with restrictions on how a transferee can use a property after receiving full ownership. The law states that when an absolute interest (full ownership) in a property is transferred, any condition that limits how the transferee can use or enjoy the property is void. However, there are exceptions where such restrictions may be allowed. General Rule Under Section 11 Section 11 applies only when full ownership of the property is transferred....

Read More
12 Mar 2025

Posted by: Aishwarya Chourasia

Rajasthan Judiciary Syllabus 2025: Prelims & Mains

The Rajasthan Judicial Services (RJS) Exam 2025 has introduced notable changes to its syllabus, incorporating new laws and legal provisions. Candidates preparing for the exam must align their study approach with these updates to gain a competitive advantage. The Rajasthan Judiciary exam consists of three stages: Prelims Mains  Interview.  Clearing all three stages is essential to becoming a judge in Rajasthan. Providing a comprehensive guide on the following aspects of the RJS 2025 exam: Subjects included in the Preliminary Examination....

Read More
15 Feb 2025

Posted by: Aishwarya Chourasia

Interest May Be Denied to a Party Who Abused Judicial Process: Supreme Court

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has clarified that while interest is typically awarded in commercial disputes under Section 34 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) to compensate for the time value of money, it may be denied in cases where a party's conduct undermines judicial integrity. The Case at Hand A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan, in the case of M/s. Tomorrowland Limited vs. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited & Another [2025....

Read More
14 Feb 2025

Posted by: Aishwarya Chourasia

Supreme Court Condemns Misogynistic Language in Judgments: A Landmark Ruling on Women’s Dignity and Rights

Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in a landmark ruling, has strongly criticized the use of misogynistic language in judicial pronouncements, stated that terms like "illegitimate wife" or "faithful mistress" violate a woman’s fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This decision comes in response to a Bombay High Court judgment that employed such derogatory expressions in a case concerning a void marriage. Background of the Case The case in question arose in the matter of Sukhdev....

Read More
13 Feb 2025

Posted by: Aishwarya Chourasia

Alleged Harassment Leaves Victim No Option but Suicide for Abetment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India recently quashed charges of abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)(Now Section 108 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,2023), emphasizing that for such charges to hold, the alleged harassment must be so severe that it leaves the victim with no alternative but to end their life. Additionally, it must be established that the accused had the intention to aid or abet the deceased in committing suicide. Understanding Abetment of Suicide under Section....

Read More
03 Feb 2025

Posted by: Aishwarya Chourasia

Kerala Court Issues Non-Bailable Warrant Against Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna in Misleading Ads Case

Kerala court has issued non-bailable warrants against Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna, key figures behind Patanjali Ayurved, after their non-appearance in a criminal case filed by the Kerala Drugs Inspector. The case involves allegations against Divya Pharmacy (an affiliate of Patanjali) for publishing misleading medical advertisements in violation of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954. The Drugs Inspector filed a complaint under Section 3 of the Act, which prohibits the advertisement of drugs that claim to cure....

Read More